Our take
Elan The Presidential, positioned in Sector 106 Gurgaon by the Elan Group, lands in the Caution band with a composite score of 63/100. That number is neither a red flag nor a green light — it reflects a project where a handful of signals genuinely reassure, and a notable cluster of data gaps make it too early to commit with confidence. Buyers willing to do additional groundwork may find merit here; those seeking clean, verifiable due diligence before signing should wait until several blanks are filled in.
Where the project earns its points
The most credible positive is the developer's litigation profile. Court-case data returns zero active cases against Elan Group, which translates to a full 100/100 on that signal and is a meaningful data point in a market where builder disputes are common. The risk sub-score (69/100) reinforces this: no pending litigation, no recent negative news items flagged in monitored sources. Neither oversupply risk nor news sentiment is definitively negative.
Sector 106 as a locality also contributes moderately. The absorption score sits at 90/100 — suggesting inventory in this micro-market is not stacking up unsold, which is a reasonable proxy for underlying demand. The locality composite of 67/100 is serviceable, though the headline price YoY and rental yield signals both read as zero, which means live market movement data could not be verified at the time of this audit. That absence matters and is discussed below.
Where caution is warranted
RERA registration is the single largest concern. The project is flagged as unregistered or not supplied. Under RERA 2016, marketing or accepting bookings for an unregistered residential project is non-compliant. Until a valid RERA ID is confirmed and publicly verifiable on the Haryana RERA portal, buyers have limited statutory recourse. Configurations, the price band, and the possession timeline are all unspecified in available data — meaning the fundamental commercial terms of the investment cannot be independently assessed at this stage.
Financial transparency is low. The financial sub-score of 40/100 is the weakest pillar in the scorecard. Paid-up capital registers at zero INR in available records, yielding a capital score of just 30/100. The date of the last RoC filing is null — meaning recency of regulatory compliance with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs cannot be confirmed. The MCA company status itself is unknown, contributing only 50/100 to the developer score. Taken together, these gaps mean the corporate health of the entity behind this project is flagged as low confidence and requires direct verification through MCA21 or a professional registry check.
Market data is incomplete. Price YoY growth and rental yield both read as zero in our model run — not because the market is flat, but because live data for this specific micro-market or configuration type was unavailable at audit time. A rental yield score of 45/100 is below the threshold that would support an income-return thesis. NRI or OCI buyers underwriting this on yield expectations should treat those figures as unconfirmed until refreshed market comps are obtained from a credible independent broker or registered valuer.
Delivery posture is unknown. For an under-construction project, delivery track record and contractual possession commitments are among the highest-weight risk factors a buyer can assess. That signal is absent here. Elan Group's history on other projects — timelines met, RERA completion certificates obtained, handover quality — should be independently verified before any booking amount changes hands.
Framing the 63
The score reflects what can be confirmed: no active court cases, reasonable locality absorption, and no adverse news. It does not reflect confidence in financial solidity, regulatory compliance, or delivery capability — because that data either does not exist in accessible sources or was not supplied. A 63 in this band means the project is not in distress territory, but it carries enough open questions that the risk-adjusted case for buying is not yet established.
For NRI or OCI buyers specifically, the lack of RERA registration is a hard stop for due diligence purposes. Statutory protections, escrow mechanisms, and grievance redressal under RERA are not available without a valid registration number.
What to verify before signing
- RERA status: Confirm a valid RERA registration number on the official Haryana RERA portal (hrera.org.in) before paying any booking amount; if the project remains unregistered, treat any payment as carrying full counterparty risk.
- MCA and RoC filings: Pull the developer entity's MCA21 record directly to confirm company status, paid-up capital, and the date of the most recent annual filing; engage a CA or company secretary if interpreting filings independently is not feasible.
- Possession SLA and escrow compliance: Request the draft allotment letter and builder-buyer agreement; verify that a RERA-mandated escrow account exists and that the stated possession date carries a liquidated-damages clause.
- Site and construction progress: Conduct a physical site visit or commission a third-party construction monitoring report to assess current stage, contractor activity, and whether progress is consistent with the projected timeline.
- Locality price and yield comps: Obtain at least three independent rental and resale comparable transactions in Sector 106 from a RERA-registered broker to validate yield assumptions before modelling returns.
Editorial commentary supplements — does not replace — the rubric below. Both are reviewed at every audit revision.