Developer score blends MCA company status (Active) with court-case load (0 cases). Status contributes 60%, litigation density 40%.
M3M Mansion
We audited M3M India independently. M3M India has not engaged LandlordAgent for paid audit or marketing services. We receive no commission per sale from any developer, paid or unpaid.
Our take
M3M Mansion in Sector 113, Gurgaon scores 76 out of 100 on our composite model, placing it in the Buy band. That result is driven almost entirely by one very clean signal: the developer entity behind it. Where the project earns meaningful deductions — and where buyers should focus their own due diligence — is on documentation, locality data, and project-level delivery certainty.
Developer: the clearest strength
M3M India's entity scores a perfect 100 on our Developer sub-score. The MCA company status is Active, and our litigation screen returned zero court cases at the time of scoring. Those two factors — corporate standing and litigation density — combine at a 60/40 weight to produce a result that is unusual in our dataset. A clean litigation record on a builder operating at M3M's scale in Gurgaon is a material positive, not a formality. It does not guarantee project delivery, but it removes one of the most common structural risks NRI and OCI buyers encounter.
Project status: under construction with limited visibility
The Project sub-score of 62 reflects two realities. First, the project is under construction — an inherently lower-certainty state than ready-to-occupy, though not unusual for the Gurgaon luxury pipeline. Second, and more pointedly, the delivery posture is recorded as unknown. Our model penalises missing delivery data on the grounds that buyers cannot price timeline risk they cannot see. The score here would improve materially if possession timelines, construction milestones, and RERA registration details were publicly available. As it stands, those signals are absent.
On that note: no RERA registration was supplied for this project. For an under-construction project in Haryana, RERA registration is legally required before marketing commences. The absence of a registration number in our data is not confirmation that the project is unregistered — it may simply not have been provided to us — but it is a hard stop-and-verify item before any buyer proceeds. Do not rely on our composite score to substitute for a RERA check.
Configuration and price band data were also not supplied. This means our model cannot assess per-square-foot value relative to comparable launches or resale stock in Sector 113. Buyers should treat any pricing discussed in sales conversations as unverified against independent benchmarks.
Locality: thin data, one strong signal
The Locality sub-score of 67 is built on market signals that returned zero values for both price appreciation year-on-year and rental yield. This is not the same as saying the locality has seen no growth or generates no yield — it reflects a gap in the data we were able to retrieve at scoring time. Absent those two signals, the locality score leans on absorption pace, which scored 90, suggesting units in this micro-market move relatively quickly. That is a positive indicator for liquidity.
Sector 113 sits along the Dwarka Expressway corridor, which has seen sustained infrastructure investment, but we are not asserting specific price trends here beyond what the signal data supports. Buyers should independently source current transaction data for this sector.
Financial health: substantial capital, one gap
M3M India's paid-up capital of approximately INR 44.6 crore returns a capital score of 80. That is a meaningful level of registered capital and contributes positively to the Financial sub-score of 65. The drag on this sub-score comes from the RoC filing recency: the number of days since the last regulatory filing is null in our dataset. We flag this as low confidence on the filing dimension. A company that is current on MCA filings is easier to track and hold accountable; buyers should verify filing recency directly on the MCA portal before committing funds.
Risk: litigation-clean, but two unknowns
The Risk sub-score of 69 sits on a 90 for litigation — zero pending cases — which is a genuine positive. The two drag factors are the negative news ratio (null, because no recent news items were indexed) and the oversupply risk for the locality (also null). Absence of indexed news is not the same as a clean media record; it may simply reflect a data gap. Oversupply in the Dwarka Expressway corridor has been a known concern in prior cycles, and the inability to score it here means buyers should research current inventory levels independently.
Summary
M3M Mansion earns its Buy rating on the strength of a developer with an unusually clean legal and corporate profile, reasonable financial capitalisation, and healthy absorption signals in the locality. The case for caution rests on three specific gaps: no RERA registration confirmed, no delivery timeline on record, and thin locality price and yield data. None of these gaps are disqualifying on their own — but together they mean a buyer is accepting meaningful information risk alongside a credible developer. That risk is manageable with the right pre-signing checklist.
What to verify before signing
- RERA registration: Confirm the project holds a valid RERA registration number on the Haryana RERA portal (hrera.org.in) and review the approved layout, possession date, and escrow account details filed there.
- Possession timeline and construction stage: Conduct a physical site visit and request the builder's officially filed construction schedule; compare against the RERA-committed possession date.
- MCA filing recency: Cross-check M3M India's latest annual return and financial statement filing dates on the MCA21 portal to confirm regulatory compliance is current.
- Independent price benchmarking: Obtain registered transaction data (stamp-duty records) for comparable units in Sector 113 to validate the price per square foot being quoted.
- Locality inventory and rental comparables: Commission a short independent market report or speak with at least two non-builder brokers to assess current unsold inventory and achievable rental yield in the immediate micro-market.
Editorial commentary supplements — does not replace — the rubric below. Both are reviewed at every audit revision.
Score breakdown
Every sub-score is derived from raw signals in our ingest pipeline. Click through each card to see exactly what we measured.
Project score weighs operational status (under_construction, 60%) and delivery posture (unknown, 40%).
View underlying signals
Locality score blends price YoY (0%, 40%), rental yield (0%, 30%) and absorption months (0 mo, 30%).
View underlying signals
Financial score combines paid-up capital (446,100,000 INR, 50%) and RoC filing recency (unknown days, 50%).
View underlying signals
Risk score (higher = safer) combines news sentiment (no recent items, 40%), pending litigation (0 cases, 30%) and locality oversupply (unknown, 30%).
View underlying signals
How we got here
This audit was produced using LandlordAgent's published rubric (read the full methodology). Sub-score formulas, weights, and band thresholds are public — we do not adjust the rubric to favour any developer. When source data is missing for a signal, the sub-score uses a documented neutral fallback and we flag those zones above.
Disclaimer. Audits represent our best assessment as of the publish date and are not investment advice. Property markets are subject to regulatory, financial, and macroeconomic risks. Buyers should consult their own legal, tax, and financial advisors before transacting.
What we looked at
Every score on this page traces back to one or more of these underlying records. Where the source is public (court records, news) we link straight to it; MCA + locality snapshots are held internally and refreshed on a schedule.
- Methodology LandlordAgent rubric v1.0.0 Fetched 1 hour ago
- MCA MCA RoC filing · CIN U80903HR2007PTC044491 Fetched 2 hours ago
- Court www.livelawbiz.com (disposed) Fetched 10 minutes ago
- Court www.centrik.in (disposed) Fetched 10 minutes ago
- News m3mpropertyindia.com · M3M Properties in Gurgaon, Noida and Panipat at Best Price Fetched 11 minutes ago
- News economictimes.indiatimes.com · M3M lines up Rs 14,500 crore to accelerate 45 million sq ft real estate portfolio - The Ec... Fetched 11 minutes ago
- News myrealestate.in · M3M India is a real estate Builder in Ghaizabad . My Realestate Fetched 11 minutes ago
- News bestluxuryresidences.in · M3M India — Top Real Estate Developer in Gurgaon (2026) Fetched 11 minutes ago
- News www.propertyveda.com · Explore All Projects By M3M | PropertyVeda Fetched 11 minutes ago
- News + 5 more articles reviewed
- Locality Locality intelligence · Sector 113 (null) Fetched 11 minutes ago
Missing a source you think we should have looked at? Tell us below — the next audit version can fold it in.
Email me when this audit updates
We re-audit when fresh signals land (new court filings, RoC update, RERA change, locality data, news). You'll get a one-line email with what changed — nothing else.
Tell us what we got wrong
We publish audits as-is, including for builders that pay us. If our scoring or reasoning misses a signal — incident, source, court case, locality detail — push back. Real-name feedback gets faster review; anonymous works too.